Guardians, Gaslighters, or Gullible? Adult Narratives Affecting the Child Abuse Investigation
Adult narratives can protect the truth—or quietly distort it—in child abuse cases. This session examines Guardians, Gaslighters, and the Gullible, equipping participants to spot bias, challenge misleading narratives, and keep the child’s voice central to the investigation.
Suggested Audience: MDT members interacting with adults in proximity to child victims
Full Description: In every child abuse case, adult narratives and statements can shape — or distort — the truth. This session explores three key roles: Guardians, who show protective capacities; Gaslighters, who manipulate or discredit the child; and the Gullible, adults involved in the case or well-meaning professionals who may unintentionally overlook red flags. Through real-world examples and practical strategies, participants will learn to recognize how adult behavior and bias can undermine a child’s disclosure and case integrity. Attendees will leave better prepared to navigate complex dynamics, challenge misleading narratives, and keep the child’s voice at the center of every investigation.
Learning Objectives:
Identify ways in which adult narratives may shape or distort the course of a child abuse investigation.
Differentiate between protective, manipulative, or uninformed adult narratives to recognize how each role influences a child’s disclosure, credibility, and case outcomes.
Apply practical strategies to maintain objectivity, support accurate fact-finding methods, and ensure the child’s voice and safety remain central throughout the investigative process to support best outcomes.
Speaker(s): Alison Sutherland
